Mulshine

The Mulshine Company, Ltd. is a highly successful retained Executive Search firm, boasting over 25 years of experience in the recruitment of upper and middle management talent, as well as key individual contributors for R&D and Engineering functions. Our primary focus is on serving major Consumer Packaged Goods, Food, and Pharmaceutical clients, with an emphasis on Product, Process, and Package Design, Development, Quality, and related areas.

We pride ourselves on being a small firm that offers personalized attention, creating an emphasis on individual service. We employ the good judgment, tact, and ethics developed through many years of active practice in the search consulting industry.

Expertise

Our areas of expertise include specialized R&D, Innovation, Engineering, and Quality Search assignments from senior individual contributor to Senior Vice President for major Consumer Packaged Goods, Food, and Pharmaceutical companies. We have a deep understanding of the following areas:

• Product Development: Product Formulation, Product Design/Engineering, Industrial Design, Design Thinking, Technology Development & Open Innovation, Consumer Science, Sensory & Claims.
• Process Development: Process Design, Process Engineering, Technical Transfer, and Scale Up.
• Packaging Development: Packaging Engineering, Packaging / Industrial Design, Equipment Development.
• Quality Assurance: Food Safety, Regulatory Compliance, Nutrition & Labeling.

Our Clients

We have the privilege of serving some of the world's best-known companies in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Food, and Pharmaceutical industries. Our commitment to delivering the highest caliber professionals, from key individual contributors through senior management to VP levels, has earned us a reputation as a trusted partner in executive search.

Why Retained Search?

Retained search offers a level of commitment and time that contingent search firms cannot match. With a financial commitment upfront, retained firms can spend more time digging deeper on fewer assignments, yielding more robust candidate slates and timelier fulfillment. In contrast, contingent firms are forced to spend less time on many more assignments, often at the expense of candidate quality and commitment to completion.